← All tools

Web app · Agent Opportunity Finder

Find the work worth giving to an agent

Pick a function, tell us what you run and what matters most. You get a ranked shortlist of agent workflows, a value-versus-effort map and a suggested first deployment.

  • Three steps
  • About two minutes
  • Runs in your browser, nothing is stored

Build your shortlist

Only the first step is required. The more you tell us, the more the ranking reflects how you work.

Which function do you want to start with?

Each function has eight workflows we see agents handle well. Pick the one with the most pressure on it.

Why this matters
Start where the pain is already visible: backlogs, late closes, angry customers. An AI agent pays back fastest on work that is frequent, rule-based and full of exceptions that people currently chase by hand. A function under pressure also has a sponsor who wants it fixed.

The rubric

How the scores work

Every workflow carries three base scores from 1 to 5. We set them from what these workflows typically involve, then adjust them with your answers. Nothing here is a benchmark or a measurement of your business.

Value

Size of the prize

How much time, cash or error reduction the workflow can return, given how often it runs and what a mistake or delay costs.

1
Occasional task, small time saving
3
Weekly volume, visible hours or cash impact
5
High volume, moves a metric leadership tracks
Effort

Work to build and run

How many systems the agent touches, how clean the data is likely to be and how much process design it needs first.

1
One system, clear rules, documents already exist
3
Two or three systems, some judgment to codify
5
Many systems, messy data, process redesign first
Risk

Cost of a wrong call

What happens if the agent gets it wrong: who is affected, whether money, people or regulators are involved, and how easy it is to reverse.

1
Internal, drafts only, easy to undo
3
Touches customers, suppliers or money, with review
5
Regulated or hard to reverse decisions

Try the rubric

Call it: quick win, big bet or fill-in?

Three real workflows from the library. Judge value against effort, then see how we scored it.

Myth

The best first agent is the one with the biggest prize.

Reality

The best first agent is the one you can ship, measure and trust within a quarter. It builds the integrations, controls and credibility that the big bet will need.

Adjustments from your answers

  • Systems. If you tick any systems, a workflow whose systems you all have gets effort −0.5. One missing system adds +0.5; two or more add +1.
  • Industry. Some industries add up to +1 to value or risk for related workflows, for example reconciliation work in payments or security work in defense technology.
  • Adjusted scores are rounded to the nearest half point and kept between 1 and 5.

Fit score and ranking

Fit = (prize × value gain + speed × effort ease + low risk × risk ease) ÷ total weight

  • Value gain = (value − 1) ÷ 4. Effort ease = (5 − effort) ÷ 4. Risk ease = (5 − risk) ÷ 4. Fit is shown out of 100.
  • The suggested first deployment is the highest-ranked of your top three with risk 3 or less and effort 3.5 or less. A first agent should prove value with a clear human checkpoint.

Field guide

How to judge value against effort

The same three questions sit behind every good agent shortlist. Use them on workflows that are not in our library.

.01

Value is volume times the cost of a miss

A workflow is valuable when it runs often and when delay or error costs real money: late payments, lost discounts, unhappy customers, audit findings. How impressive the AI looks does not count. Drafting a job description is clever; clearing two thousand invoice exceptions a month is valuable.

Rule of thumbMultiply monthly volume by minutes per case, then ask what one mistake costs.

.02

Effort hides in systems and exceptions

The model is rarely the hard part. Effort comes from the number of systems the agent must read and write, the state of the data in them, and how many unwritten rules people apply to the odd cases. Count those before you estimate.

Rule of thumbEach extra system roughly adds an integration, an access review and a round of testing.

.03

Risk sets the checkpoint, not the go or no-go

Higher risk does not rule a workflow out. It changes where a person approves, what the agent may do alone and what the audit trail must show. Start low-risk to learn, then bring the same controls to higher-stakes work.

Rule of thumbAutomate up to about 80% of a task and keep people on decisions with financial, legal or customer risk.

Want a tool built for your team?

We build custom assessments, skills and internal apps as part of our engagements. Tell us what you need.